4 ms·
You might need some filtering. I got the following output for my 7th or 8th try (I did s/ig/*/g because I hate typing this): noun. n*gerbar n*·ger·bar a bar
by not2b 5y ago
You might need some filtering. I got the following output for my 7th or 8th try (I did s/ig/*/g because I hate typing this):
noun.
n*gerbar
n*·ger·bar
a bar from which the beer and liquor are sold
"that party got a whole lot cooler this week with a n*gerbar refreshment"
a word that does not exist; it was invented, defined and used by a machine learning algorithm.
- throw10920 5y ago(you might want to read up on the use-mention distinction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use%E2%80%93mention_distinction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use%E2%80%93mention_distinctio...)
- gberger 5y agoPlease could you explain the relevance of the article to the previous comment?
- not2b 5y agoPerhaps throw10920 thinks I should have just used the word because I was only quoting the output, so it wasn't really me saying it, but I chose otherwise. I don't need to read up on the use-mention distinction to decide whether to make such a choice.
- asxd 5y agoI have a feeling the parent poster realized they were only mentioning the word, but chose not to write it anyway. For a lot of people, it is a very uncomfortable word after all.
- sillysaurusx 5y agoIt's hilarious that not even this GPT side project can escape the need for OpenAI-style output filtering. Someone really ought to make an open source lib to solve this once and for all...
- wodenokoto 5y agoI don’t have access to gpt-3 but have wondered how much adding “without being offensive” to the prompt would help. On one hand it’s the promise of the algorithm that such things will work, on the other hand I doubt it.
- cookieswumchorr 5y agoa simple blocklist might be just the cheaper and easier solution. After all, blocklists were, and still are being used to filter human output as well. And fail-safe. A person with a hobby project does not have a legal/pr department to deal with the consequences of AI having a bad day
- jazzyjackson 5y agofiltering objectionable content actually requires you to build a strong AI model capable of being offended itself, so it knows to hold its tongue in mixed company edit: lest i leave this comment totally useless, the chatbot engine “chatscript” has pretty good capabilities for disambiguating word meaning and classifying the meanings into “badword” and “verybadword” - its free/libre software and very high performance. https://github.com/ChatScript/ChatScript/ https://github.com/ChatScript/ChatScript/
- mensetmanusman 5y agoObjectionable is subjective.
- lanstin 5y agoSo is skillful language use. We nonetheless think it is achievable without using wetware.
- mattnewton 5y agoI think actually solving this problem is somewhat loosely reducible to human level intelligence in language understanding. The next best thing is a pile of patches that fix cases of the increasing creativity of the human adversaries to the system as we become aware of them.
- turtlesoup 5y agoAh crap, good call. I did a first-pass at filtering for the ones displayed on the site but my regex must have had some misses.
- growt 5y agoNot as bad, but also probably something for a "blocklist": cockshop a shop selling flannel and scarves