That's interesting, though the article concludes with: > Despite the persistent connotation of “sin” as a negative attribute, it is clear that OAS-like respons

That's interesting, though the article concludes with: > Despite the persistent connotation of “sin” as a negative attribute, it is clear that OAS-like responses are neither inherently “good” nor “bad.” The desirability of OAS responses is instead context dependent It doesn't really seem from that article like we have the means to predict what OAS will be most beneficial in the future, so I think everyone are just flipping a coin here. Either you get OAS from some random vaccine available at some point in time, or you get it from randomly catching some random virus at some point in time.