You're honestly comparing apples and oranges here. One side (whistleblowers) is a case where someone actively published and drew attention to classified materia

You're honestly comparing apples and oranges here. One side (whistleblowers) is a case where someone actively published and drew attention to classified material. The other one is someone who was careless with classified material due to laziness and either A) not caring about the ramifications of that or B) not knowing. I'm not defending Clinton, she's icky for many other reasons (not the least of which is her insincerity and power fixation), but your comparison is a non-sequitur.