> I wonder why they don't replace these simple packages like `is-string` with Lodash... As someone who maintains a few dozen packages (public and otherwise), l

> I wonder why they don't replace these simple packages like `is-string` with Lodash... As someone who maintains a few dozen packages (public and otherwise), lodash has wasted more of my time than any other - due to its frequent security issues. It was almost always lodash, and I would have to update a dozen packages everytime. Things may have improved; I no longer use lodash anywhere.