3 ms·
That's a claim unsupported by research[1]. > Results >From 2001 through 2015, increases in state-level excise taxes were associated with declines in prevalenc
by mullingitover 5y ago
That's a claim unsupported by research[1].
> Results
>From 2001 through 2015, increases in state-level excise taxes were associated with declines in prevalence of cigarette smoking. The effect was strongest in young adults (age 18–24) and weakest in low-income individuals (<$25,000).
So yes, taxes actually do at least affect smoking rates in the most vulnerable population. If you don't start smoking in your teens, you're much less likely to become a lifelong smoker.
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6147505/
- Kbelicius 5y agoYour source has no relation to the claim that you are trying to refute. That claim being: "It wasn’t sin taxes that stopped people smoking on planes, in restaurants, etc. "