> but what about the opposing viewpoints like those from law enforcement? You're right, I may be ignorant of the issues that support the need for weakening enc

> but what about the opposing viewpoints like those from law enforcement? You're right, I may be ignorant of the issues that support the need for weakening encryption, but the fact is that I can evaluate the other side of the equation. And if the side pushing against encryption is making terrible arguments, I can see how terrible they objectively are. > Do nuclear scientists define nuclear energy policies or do they provide advice to those that define them? Similar thing: the arguments against nuclear power are idiotic and typically plain wrong and based on irrational appeals to fear. Just like the previous issue, if a decision has to be made, it has to balance the pros and cons. Even if I can only properly evaluate only one side of the equation and find it lacking, I can certainly have serious doubts as to the legitimacy of the choice presented. And that's one side more than most people can grasp.