4 ms·
Not OP but curating a large backlog of items is a lot of work they smaller projects might not find worth it. I am not surprised many projects chose to automati
by darknavi 5y ago
Not OP but curating a large backlog of items is a lot of work they smaller projects might not find worth it.
I am not surprised many projects chose to automatically close inactive items. It's the epitome of "the squeaky wheel gets the grease".
- Vinnl 5y agoGenerally the amount of work should be equal, especially when, as in OPs case, the curation is already happening. But even when not already curating, what is effectively a simple rename could already prevent a lot of complaints: rather than automatically closing stale issues, you could either just have them tagged "Stale" and filter those out of your own view (if you prefer passively dealing with stale issues), or automatically tag all new issues as "Untriaged" and remove that tag if you want them to show up in your view (if you want more active curation).