4 ms·
Yeah, similarly we have crap locks in doors. They are there more to make it somewhat laborious to open to door, hence signal privacy, than make it nigh impossib
by fsloth 5y ago
Yeah, similarly we have crap locks in doors. They are there more to make it somewhat laborious to open to door, hence signal privacy, than make it nigh impossible to break in. That's why we have bank vaults and so on when we really want to deny access.
For convenient security you want just enough complexity a bot wont automatically unlock it, for proper security something that can be even a bit unconvenient as long as it's more secure.
I agree, biometrics should probably be in the "breakable, convenient" category.
- hef19898 5y agoExactly, every-day security is there to prevent random dudes. And even they can, to stay with homes, just break a window. Serious opponents, especially if they are really motivated, will be able to break into everything. The three letter agencies, and their counterparts in other countries, are obviously on the very professional and very motivated end of the spectrum. Personally, I don't see any reason to make overly easy for any of those parties. So no biometrical data to be exchanged for some new form dogecoin.