4 ms·
That would be pretty cool. It would already work in github, but yeah a dedicated site would probably be better ;-). I'm afraid that the intersection of people i
by d--b 5y ago
That would be pretty cool. It would already work in github, but yeah a dedicated site would probably be better ;-). I'm afraid that the intersection of people interesting in cooking and people who know how source control works is likely pretty niche
The other problem I have with community cooking websites is that usually people always underestimate the cooking time and that's annoying as hell. Like people would say you need to cook onions for 10 minutes, while onions take close to 25 minutes to be cooked. On the French website marmiton, it was so ubiquitous that they have moderators come in and fix people's recipes.
Edit: see https://slate.com/human-interest/2012/05/how-to-cook-onions-why-recipe-writers-lie-and-lie-about-how-long-they-take-to-caramelize.html https://slate.com/human-interest/2012/05/how-to-cook-onions-...
- fiedzia 5y ago> people would say you need to cook onions for 10 minutes, while onions take close to 25 minutes to be cooked It's up to recipe author to define what they cook and how. If you think 25 min is better, fork it.
- egeozcan 5y agoOr report the bug, which should probably have another name in this context.
- pintxo 5y agoJust another reason to allow easy forking ;-)
- rkangel 5y agoMy issue with recipe timings is that even if you cook things for as long as it says, the overall time to cook the recipe is always very "optimistic". I assume the issue is some combination of marketing and the fact that the test cook was done by a professional chef who can dice 10 onions in a minute.
- 2muchcoffeeman 5y agoI imagine it’s done that way because people don’t necessarily know what to look for when cooking something. If some one doesn’t know how to cook steak, you can’t tell them “cook till medium rare”. So we start trying to come up with proxies.
- phonypc 5y agoI very much doubt that most recipe timings actually involve a timed test cook at all. They're just guesstimates.
- dkarl 5y agoIngredient prep is intentionally left out of recipe timings. In theory, this lets everybody adapt the recipe timing to themselves, because only you know if you can chop two onions in three minutes or thirty seconds, but as with the Doomsday Device in Doctor Strangelove, it's worse than useless if nobody knows about it. "Why didn't you tell the world?"
- 2muchcoffeeman 5y agoThat’s to caramelise onions. Cooking onions through takes a few minutes. Plenty of instances where you don’t want to caramelise onions.
- d--b 5y agoNot really caramelise is more like 40 minutes. You do need at the very minimum 15 minutes to cook onions, 20 to 25 to “brown” them.
- davidjytang 5y agoHow do we specify "cook until translucent"?
- culpable_pickle 5y agoI believe the term is usually "Sweat the onion"
- randomswede 5y agoThe main problem for me (who am interested in cooking, as well as somewhat au fait with version control) is that at this point in my life, I could not for the life of me write down a recipe for almost anything that I cook, because it is all based on "enough" and "to taste", with cooking times being in the "well, you look at the ingredients and a cooking schedule effortlessly forms in your mind" (none, by the way, based on actual time), allowing me to do things like cooking things in the oven and three or four pots on the stove, and have everything ready at the same time, by staggering the start times. And I literally cannot tell you how I do it, because at this point, I don't know. I do know how I got there, though. Cooking, lots of it, at various scales and in variously equipped kitchens. Scale-wise, I have cooked for 1. And on the upper end, I have cooked for about 50.