3 ms·
As all of them are NOT official, official software names should not be used in names of such 'forks' (3rd-party builds) without permission. Much worse, as you
by app4soft 5y ago
As all of them are NOT official, official software names should not be used in names of such 'forks' (3rd-party builds) without permission.
Much worse, as you can see there are "Scribus Indesign" and "DarkTable LightRoom" which violates not only Scibus & darktable official names use, but also Adobe InDesign & Adobe Lightroom registered trademarks.
FTR, There are also legal 3rd-party publishers who sells FOSS/FLOSS via Microsoft Store, for example see LibreOffice official partners list.[0]
[0] https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-from-microsoft-and-mac-app-stores/ https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-from-micros...
- WalterGR 5y agoofficial software names should not be used in names of such 'forks' (3rd-party builds) without permission. In an ideal world, absolutely. But trademarks (names) are distinct from copyright (source code,) and not all OSS licenses deal with the former.
- app4soft 5y ago> In an ideal world, absolutely As it violates copyright & GPL it violates Microsoft Store TOS too.