3 ms·

I think they will with a new release of the “Afterburner” card, this time powered by Apple Silicon instead of FPGAs. https://www.gettingtechnologyright.com/app

I think they will with a new release of the “Afterburner” card, this time powered by Apple Silicon instead of FPGAs. https://www.gettingtechnologyright.com/apples-mac-pro-wheels-are-optional/ https://www.gettingtechnologyright.com/apples-mac-pro-wheels... >The second bit of design is in the optional “Afterburner” video editing card. The discussion of it starts at around the 1hr. 26 min. point in the Keynote. It is described as a custom FPGA-based HW accelerator. It is claimed to be capable of processing 6 billion pixels per second. The silicon is not Apple’s but the design is.

saagarjha 5y ago
Isn't the point of a FPGA that you can reconfigure it? It seems like a waste to expend it on another CPU.
- Tsiklon 5y ago
  I’ve certainly seen in low volume specialty equipment (think things like Video Routers, and surprisingly some high end audio equipment) FPGAs being used where an ASIC would be a better fit. I suspect however this comes down to a business decision, that the time and money spent getting a run of an ASIC with the same logic put together may be better spent elsewhere.
  - fragmede 5y ago
    The FPGA can be deployed and designed for today, while an ASIC isn't going to ready until after a few tape outs, and it's often a race to market. While it's really cool and actually works, the reality is that reconfiguring the hardware to do something different isn't a necessary feature in just about anything. There's still a huge market for FPGAs, but its already got a lot of active competition.