3 ms·
> You can't really avoid this either without throwing out judicial precedent because "knowing how the court will rule on subsequent cases" is basically the same
by rpmisms 5y ago
> You can't really avoid this either without throwing out judicial precedent because "knowing how the court will rule on subsequent cases" is basically the same as law.
But that's not law. That's consistent interpretation of law. Very different.
- xxpor 5y agoYou're confusing statutes and the law. They're not the same thing. Just like a regulation isn't a statute, but it is the law.