In support of this comment, compare the dockets on courtlistener in this case (https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4181898/total-recall-technologies-v-palmer-l

In support of this comment, compare the dockets on courtlistener in this case (https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4181898/total-recall-technologies-v-palmer-luckey/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4181898/total-recall-te...) versus, say, Epic v Apple (https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17442392/epic-games-inc-v-apple-inc/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17442392/epic-games-inc...) or Google v Uber (https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4609586/waymo-llc-v-uber-technologies-inc/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4609586/waymo-llc-v-ube...). What jumps out at me is how little is available via RECAP on this case. The amended complaints, for example, aren't available--and that's literally the most important of the lawsuit! In the more interesting cases, far more of the docket is available, and often even some of the uninteresting minutiae of the docket (e.g., applications for pro hac vice) are sometimes available, presumably because someone unfamiliar with how the courts work wonders why this isn't available, buys it themself only to discover that it actually was uninteresting.