There is a lack of control groups with these kind of internal studies although, they were not built for general public consumption in mind. What would happen i

There is a lack of control groups with these kind of internal studies although, they were not built for general public consumption in mind. What would happen in a world without facebook, but still the general internet & smartphones, where kids will IM each other with private cameras and look at things their social groups make without real supervision, not to mention the wild west that is the general internet? How much is the issue "the internet", "magazines", "0 cost private photography", "economic decline" and "cultural changes"? I remember in the 90s and 2000s all the issues created with girl's body image and cosmo magazine for example. How much of this is the paper manufacturers (FB), and what is written on the piece of paper (Users of FB ads) and so on? And part of fixing a problem that you have now is figuring out what that problem is. If we slap people and organizations from admitting a problem and trying to fix it, they will just ignore it. The fact they are making such studies is a good thing. A lot of this attention on FB and so on is also political power annoyed that a large new media platform upset the political election balance in the USA. If social media didn't have party political effects in the USA, we all know most of this attention wouldn't be happening, and negative effects on groups will continue unabated. So it makes people not trust many of the anti-FBers rethortic, because we don't trust the person's intentions. Do you actually "think of the children" or is this for tribal political reasons?