3 ms·
As I said, rationalizations. What is also amazing is that people think that repeating the obvious in vaguely sassy fashion is somehow an argument. In any case,
by jeegsy 5y ago
As I said, rationalizations. What is also amazing is that people think that repeating the obvious in vaguely sassy fashion is somehow an argument. In any case, Youtube's "rights" as you call them would be more palatable if they did not enjoy section 230 immunity. Furthermore, I'm sure there is a legal case to be made regarding the Government employing private actors in a manner that violates the first amendment.
- tragictrash 5y agoSo you want to limit free speech then? Who gets to have free speech in your opinion? It is sad I have to repeat myself so you can understand that private companies can do as they please.
- jeegsy 5y agoI have said no such thing, quite the opposite. If you have truly missed that then, an further discussion with you is doomed.
- tragictrash 5y agoNah you got me, that was a trap