5 ms·

Is there a better source on this? Daily Mail is terrible: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-mail/

• bduerst 5y ago
  It's blog-/reprint-spam of the original Forbes Article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/10/04/google-keyword-warrants-give-us-government-data-on-search-users/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/10/04/googl...
• jdgoesmarching 5y ago
  The Daily Mail is terrible, but so is Media Bias fact check. Their methodology is a joke regardless of your politics.
  • alexpw 5y ago
    Which alternative to MBFC is preferred? AllSides or AdFontesMedia or?
• exhilaration 5y ago
  Forbes appears to be the original source and is linked in the article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/10/04/google-keyword-warrants-give-us-government-data-on-search-users/?sh=289c1f717c97 https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/10/04/googl...
• myfavoritedog 5y ago
  mediabiasfactcheck looks pretty terrible too. A quick spot survey of who they think is left, right, and accurate is obviously off. Then when you look at the biased organizations they leverage for they're "fact checking", you can't have much hope for the end results. How can you trust an information source analysis site built upon untrustworthy information sources? "fact checking" is just another power center that is easily taken over by those seeking political power.
• altacc 5y ago
  I was quite surprised it was covered in the Daily Mail as they are usually in favour of trampling on privacy & civil liberties in the name of law & order. They're classic "nothing to fear if you've done nothing wrong" types, especially when the aim is to catch terrorists.