> So first you assume it is a FB group, Who's "you"? Not me. > and when you get called out on it with the Forbes article I posted the Forbes opinion piece on

> So first you assume it is a FB group, Who's "you"? Not me. > and when you get called out on it with the Forbes article I posted the Forbes opinion piece on my own, elsewhere, before spotting that someone else had also posted it. I was not "called out". > You sure do need a lot of characters though. So does the (bad, i.e. intentionally misleading) Forbes piece. It's plainly shit judging just from what's in the piece itself, and it's written by an explicitly, as noted in the piece biased author. Is there a better piece on this? Everything else I could find was on very sketchy sites and repeated the same stuff. Of course since the numbers themselves, as gathered by an organization run by the person writing the piece, don't tell the story the article wants you to think it's telling, I think it's a fair guess that no such "good version" of this piece exists.