3 ms·
My claims are without evidence, but it certainly seems as if this document was created with the intentions/hope that it would be eventually leaked. The second
by gzer0 5y ago
My claims are without evidence, but it certainly seems as if this document was created with the intentions/hope that it would be eventually leaked.
The second slide seems rather suspicous in its placement of "CAST members are not qualified to testify after reading this"; almost as if they were not speaking to an audience of CAST members, but rather, the public.
Perhaps a decoy? to draw attention away from STINGRAY and other intricacies?
- dragonwriter 5y ago> The second slide seems rather suspicous in its placement of "CAST members are not qualified to testify after reading this"; almost as if they were not speaking to an audience of CAST members, but rather, the public. Sounds like they are doing advance witness tampering by trying to get CAST members to evade calls to testify on material facts known to them should they receive such, not lobbying the public via anticipated future leak. (I’m not even sure how the statement about testimony would be expected to manipulate the public.)
- gzer0 5y agoThat is a valid consideration. Touché.
- Spooky23 5y agoIt’s pretty obvious the audience are consumers of the service. (ie other FBI agents) If you’ve ever had to testify as an expert, it’s an art and a science. You need a lot of training to be able to respond to the traps attorneys will set for you.