2 ms·
So, the reason I wanted to talk about this mathematical type--and then used the wrong term :(--is because of how +,* forms a ring... and so does ^,&. It isn't s
by saurik 5y ago
So, the reason I wanted to talk about this mathematical type--and then used the wrong term :(--is because of how +,* forms a ring... and so does ^,&. It isn't sufficient to say "modular arithmetic".
- Sniffnoy 5y agoI see, interesting. Yeah at that point you have more structure there. But yeah that's just like... two overlapping ring structures? Hm. <shrug>