4 ms·
One of the photos literally shows an actual 1st-gen iPod on top of it.
by ubermonkey 5y ago
One of the photos literally shows an actual 1st-gen iPod on top of it.
- happytoexplain 5y agoDid you read my entire comment?
- ubermonkey 5y agoYes.
- happytoexplain 5y agoYour comment (especially the colloquial use of the word "literally" as emphasis) implies that I didn't address the existence of that photo, but I did when I said "scroll down to see photos that actually demonstrate its size". Your comment and subsequent lack of clarification ("Yes.") is confusing and has the appearance of rudeness, but I can't guess why you would want to use that tone (if it's on purpose).
- IncRnd 5y agoWhen something is shown literally as a picture of an object that is in contrast to a figurative drawing of a concept.
- ubermonkey 5y agoK.
- happytoexplain 5y agoAlways try to either engage or not engage, rather than falling for the temptation of trolling.
- ubermonkey 5y agoK.
- chucky 5y agoAh yes. I'll just pull out my 1st gen iPod from my pocket for reference then!
- HelixEndeavor 5y agoYou've seen enough pictures of people holding them to get a good reference for the size.
- chucky 5y agoI've owned one. But that was a million years ago. It's somewhere between the size of a box of matches and my current phone, but that's a pretty big range. Edit: OK so maybe the reference of a gen 1 ipod is actually quite useful to me. But it's a 20 year old reference to use. Surely there are plenty of things around that are more useful as a reference point if you need one (or just provide measurements).
- MikusR 5y agoI am not a rich american, so I have not.