2 ms·
I get what you are saying, but I have no way to know whether or not it's valid to any degree. Maybe the "constructive" part of what I am trying to say is that w
by throw1234651234 5y ago
I get what you are saying, but I have no way to know whether or not it's valid to any degree. Maybe the "constructive" part of what I am trying to say is that we either need better education on the fundamentals here, better examples, better explanations, or should just admit that it's far beyond the layman.
For example, I get entanglement. I can get answers to questions like "Is FTL comm possible? No." or "What is a practical application for entanglement? Quantum radar - sorting your initial emission from jamming." etc.
This though? Just too abstract (for me).