3 ms·
I think the numbers on traffic injuries and fatalities really do speak for themselves. A full percent of the US population gets injured by cars every year — tha
by bichiliad 5y ago
I think the numbers on traffic injuries and fatalities really do speak for themselves. A full percent of the US population gets injured by cars every year — that's a pretty staggering number.
I'm not a fan of the reasoning the article gives behind why we have normalized them ("toxic individualism"), because I think there are a lot more obvious culprits. For example, the auto industry is extremely effective at lobbying, and has been for a very long time. The reason there are jaywalking laws on the books, for example, was in large part because the auto industry pushed for them [1][2]. Urban streets were not really built with fast-moving cars in mind, and people treated them as safe places to be. Cars were much faster than anything else using the streets, so their introduction caused a sharp uptick in fatalities. A really successful PR campaign painted the people crossing the street as the ones at fault over the drivers, and the resulting laws still exist in many places in the US.
We normalize a lot of stuff, and it's easy to argue that it's because of a stereotype about Americans (that we're all aggressively individualist, which may be true to some extent). But decades of policies that require parking in new buildings, that encourage driving for even small errands, and that rezone urban areas to accommodate car traffic make it really hard to imagine a world without them. No one thinks car crashes are good, but few people have alternatives (even in denser urban areas). Crashes feel like an unavoidable side-effect.
1: https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26073797 https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26073797
2: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25497772 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25497772
- randcraw 5y agoThere are many ways to REDUCE the number and severity of accidents. It starts with increasing the cost of causing one — fines, jail time, loss of license — there are many ways to discourage stupid driving, and the US absolutely does not take this option seriously enough. Anyone who rides a bike or motorcycle knows that drivers freely overlook us. And we know why. When a fool driver kills one of us, they pay absolutely no price for it. Jail time? Never. Fines? Rarely, if ever. Why then should a texting driver refrain from LOLing to their heart's delight behind the wheel, at night, in fog? There's no reason not to. We could also improve road safety greatly if driver training and testing were improved. Every EU member nation requires more rigorous driver training and exams than the US. And we should continue that training with mandatory refresher courses to renew and develop deeper skills as we age. To reward those who put more effort into sharpening their driving skills, insurance companies could offer discounts for those who choose to take even more instruction or score higher on exams. There’s surely a virtuous cycle in here somewhere, but only if Americans care enough to so something about driving smarter. So far, we clearly haven't.