3 ms·
Java is not usually considered to be a statically-typed language and I was not implying that it was. And the definition of dynamic typing is somewhat vague to m
by temporallobe 5y ago
Java is not usually considered to be a statically-typed language and I was not implying that it was. And the definition of dynamic typing is somewhat vague to me, although allowing unspecified type inference is somewhat dynamic, even though one cannot reassign the variable to a different type at a later point.
And my point about was that Java was designed to be verbose, except that now “var” breaks this verboseness. I am sure there was plenty debate on this topic already, but I thought it would be interesting to reason about how this changes the character and perception of Java.
- dunefox 5y ago> Java is not usually considered to be a statically-typed language Java is absolutely considered a statically typed language. Compare it to Python and CL, then you know what the difference is.