4 ms·
> You’d be tempted to throw a good number of shots away, but more often you didn’t, because film was expensive and tossing out photographs seemed like a vain an
by shusaku 5y ago
> You’d be tempted to throw a good number of shots away, but more often you didn’t, because film was expensive and tossing out photographs seemed like a vain and frivolous thing to do.
At some point, I suppose cloud storage gets cheap enough (or outpaces file sizes…) that you end up keeping the bad digital photos because it’s not worth the effort to delete them
- ghaff 5y agoFor me, it's not so much the storage; that's cheap. But without some level of curation, whether or not you actually delete most of the "rejects," it's a management headache. How do you find the shots you care about buried by everything else?
- mikewarot 5y agoIf you hoard things, you end up learning a new rule "if you can't find it, you don't own it"... if you don't curate, you'll learn the rule as well.