>Homelessness is a solved problem. It is but I can 100% confirm that nobody in cali wants to solve that problem. >The only solution viable for these residents

>Homelessness is a solved problem. It is but I can 100% confirm that nobody in cali wants to solve that problem. >The only solution viable for these residents is getting rid of homeless people through force. This solution isn't viable neither. The Cali government policy(ies) is increasing the rate of homelessness. Even if you were to round them all up and send all homeless out of the state, it isn't viably going to solve the problem. >This in untenable give that these residents also have internalized a set of liberal moral values, which mostly means alleviating guilt by dumping money onto ineffective non-profit organization who at worst are siphoning public funds for themselves or at best are trying their best at executing strategies which have minimal impact. It's worse than that. You might expect there's some benefit there but this mechanism itself is actually making the situation worse. Though it's certainly not popular to discuss that direction. Afterall what you're saying is road to hell is paved with good intentions. >Norway has homeless population of 0.07% by mostly doing one thing: building and giving homes to people who don't have them. Not quite accurate, they dont give away free homes. It's more like bomb shelters and such that the homeless can live in, but even that'snot quite accurate. The sole reason Norway has practically no homeless is because they have no actual minimum wage.