A few notes: 1.) A and B are not my proposals; They're case law that has been preempted by C. 2.) Copyright falls under the DMCA, which pretty much follows A'

A few notes: 1.) A and B are not my proposals; They're case law that has been preempted by C. 2.) Copyright falls under the DMCA, which pretty much follows A's procedures (i.e., a takedown notice model) even though the DMCA is a statutory provision. Why are copyright holders so special? 3.) There is no constitutional right to an ad-based business model. Ad-based models evolved under rules similar to B's, but for newspapers, and B is what should govern said models online (unless someone can demonstrate a successful ad-based model under A). 4.) CDA 230 is the golden goose; hence, it won't be repealed. Everyone gets paid to the detriment of society and the individuals who are denied their day in court.