3 ms·
You're confusing the book review, which pieces together disparate parts of the book, with the historian's evidence.
by lern_too_spel 5y ago
You're confusing the book review, which pieces together disparate parts of the book, with the historian's evidence.
- dash2 5y agoPerhaps, but if the evidence quoted by the review here is typical, then that reflects badly on the book.
- lern_too_spel 5y agoWhy? You're making the mistake you're accusing the book of making. You're presenting something as evidence of the book being bad that doesn't actually support that argument.