4 ms·
There is a big difference between an honest mistake and willful actions that sabotage the job. For the latter normal employees are being held personally respons
by FpUser 5y ago
There is a big difference between an honest mistake and willful actions that sabotage the job. For the latter normal employees are being held personally responsible. There is no reason prosecutors / police / similar should be the exception. They've committed criminal acts. Let the fuckers suffer the same fate they've imposed on their victims at taxpayers expense.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> There is a big difference between an honest mistake and willful actions that sabotage the job Willful sabotage is not protected by QI. > They've committed criminal acts. Criminal liability isn't affected by QI (it is affected by absolute immunity, but that only applies to things that are mandatory, not discretionary, parts of the job.)
- FpUser 5y ago>"Willful sabotage is not protected by QI." Then please explain please how withholding exculpatory evidence contrary to the law is not a willful sabotage?
- q1w2 5y agoYour argument makes no sense because qualified immunity doesn't even protect against CRIMINAL acts, even today.
- FpUser 5y agoSo I take it then that willfully ignoring a law and withholding an exculpatory evidence is not a crime then. Nice. Basically license to screw one's life without any consequences.