3 ms·
> No, he's saying we should all stay in the 1990s with FFDH, which, ironically, involves even more magic parameters. Which magic parameters are you referring t
by schoen 5y ago
> No, he's saying we should all stay in the 1990s with FFDH, which, ironically, involves even more magic parameters.
Which magic parameters are you referring to? Like the choice of groups in RFCs 2409 and 3526?
- tptacek 5y agoYep. I'm just suggesting that it's tricky to evaluate FFDH groups for different applications (for instance, with SRP), and there's less clear guidance about which to use, while with curves the popular curve choices are pretty intensely studied and argued about.