5 ms·
When I was younger (Actually I was pulled over about a year ago for no reason.). I was pulled over for basically an old car, and hair below my ears. I didn't wa
by hellbannedguy 5y ago
When I was younger (Actually I was pulled over about a year ago for no reason.). I was pulled over for basically an old car, and hair below my ears. I didn't want to say anything, but knew if didn't kiss their badge, I might get pricy ticket.
The one time I didn't answer their rediculious questions, like, "Where you are going. What are you buying at Safeway. It seems strange you are buying dinner at 10 pm". These were the actual questions.
She walked around my car looking for something to ticket, and then said I was speeding. A $350 ticket.
Yea, I tried to fight it, but she actually showed up in court, and the judge sided with the Police Officer.
(In California their was a bill that would essentially legalize jaywalking. It was drafted because cops were using jaywalking violations to harass, and intimidate citizens. Basically, I have nothing on you, but I could site you for jaywalking.
Governor Neusome vetoed the bill. I get where he was comming from, but still disappointed.
I don't know the solution other than every cop, including undercover cops, should have a camera on every minute of their shift. Only using a bathroom could the cop flip the cover on the camera.
Those tapes should be allowed to be retrieved in an easy fashion by anyone. If cops resist, their are many people in line for that job.)
- landemva 5y agoThe start of a solution is to remove the USSC-created fiction of government immunity. A few money judgments against individuals and they will all shape up. Note that a private person doesn't have their civil lawsuit attorney file a motion to dismiss because of immunity. Giving government bad actors immunity causes behaviors that are harmful. Black Lives Matter would do well to look at this, if they are interested in the causes of government misconduct.
- q1w2 5y agoNo, they will all just quit. There is no job on Earth that you could fill, from teacher to plumber to police officer, that literally anyone would do if they were held personally responsible for doing their job wrong on the job. It's insane that people want to strip this worker protection away from workers.
- jagged-chisel 5y agoThere has to be some kind of balance against the overwhelming power law enforcement wields over citizens. Maybe totally removing qualified immunity isn't the answer. But something needs to change to curtail abuse. I have no idea what that might be - even stepping up internal enforcement of policy and proper procedure might have the unintended consequence of law enforcement becoming reluctant to do their jobs.
- FpUser 5y agoThere is a big difference between an honest mistake and willful actions that sabotage the job. For the latter normal employees are being held personally responsible. There is no reason prosecutors / police / similar should be the exception. They've committed criminal acts. Let the fuckers suffer the same fate they've imposed on their victims at taxpayers expense.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> There is a big difference between an honest mistake and willful actions that sabotage the job Willful sabotage is not protected by QI. > They've committed criminal acts. Criminal liability isn't affected by QI (it is affected by absolute immunity, but that only applies to things that are mandatory, not discretionary, parts of the job.)
- FpUser 5y ago>"Willful sabotage is not protected by QI." Then please explain please how withholding exculpatory evidence contrary to the law is not a willful sabotage?
- q1w2 5y agoYour argument makes no sense because qualified immunity doesn't even protect against CRIMINAL acts, even today.
- FpUser 5y ago