3 ms·
Would it make sense for juries to be "sticky"? In the sense that any subsequent legal action must be judged by the initial finders of fact? Seems like that cou
by salawat 5y ago
Would it make sense for juries to be "sticky"? In the sense that any subsequent legal action must be judged by the initial finders of fact?
Seems like that could forestall this type of tactic. Then again, the fact J&J can calve off legal liabilities like that seems extremely questionable.
- clairity 5y agoas noted in my sibling comment, this isn't a problem in practice. the misguided commenter wants to assert 'science', without regard to the nuance of the situation. the legal system, while imperfect, doesn't generally look kindly to this kind of tenuous manuevering. the question is whether it has enough integrity (and ingenuity) to negate this sort of decrepit evasion.