3 ms·
Thank you montroser. This is something that really bugged me, when I (belatedly) tested it on mobile. I had to chose between optimizing for mobile, and optimi
by Curiositry 5y ago
Thank you montroser.
This is something that really bugged me, when I (belatedly) tested it on mobile. I had to chose between optimizing for mobile, and optimizing for desktop, and I chose the latter.
To have a good experience on mobile, you have to use landscape mode, or reduce your font size. Since it is still readable on mobile, I figured that the people who were interested in the content would know how to — and take the time to — rotate their phone so the images such would display properly.
I switched to shorter hard wrapping, so that phones with wide screens would look OK. But I found that a standard smartphone has so little horizontal screen space that no matter how short I wrapped it, it would overflow (and look just ridiculous on desktop). Also, I couldn't wrap it as much as I wanted to, because of the image I had chosen, which is fixed width.
Admittedly, wrapping on mobile — and fixed-width images in specific — is one biggest issues with this "idea" :)