That’s correct. Conservative interpretation of SchremsII is that US privacy Shield is dead and no US-owned asset may hold sensitive EU data. We have found in pr

That’s correct. Conservative interpretation of SchremsII is that US privacy Shield is dead and no US-owned asset may hold sensitive EU data. We have found in practice since this ruling that each country has different interpretations as to what “countermeasures” are allowed. From “yeah just make sure to use data locality” to “use sgx enclaves but you’re ok after that.” To “if you cannot resist fisa, we cannot trust you.”