3 ms·
:) I didn't know that. I though most/all countries in the west have an equivalent. In UK we have something like that(can't remember the name of it though). The
by White_Wolf 5y ago
:) I didn't know that. I though most/all countries in the west have an equivalent.
In UK we have something like that(can't remember the name of it though). The courts can forbid all parties involved to have any public discussions, They can ban topics from reaching the public through normal mass media means. To make it even worse, they can prevent individuals to do this sort of thing too. Prison time and/or fines if you don't comply. Democracy at it's finest.
- nix23 5y ago>I though most/all countries in the west have an equivalent. Well there is no direct gag-thing (because it would undermine free speech) BUT it could be interpreted ~sometimes and in "theory" as "obstruction of a police investigation", so it's a case to case thing and not direct law.
- White_Wolf 5y agoAaah.. I see what you mean. Tbh that sounds reasonable as long as it's applied without political pressure and such.
- JimDabell 5y ago> In UK we have something like that(can't remember the name of it though). Super-injunction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-injunctions_in_English_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super-injunctions_in_English_l...