4 ms·
Those are claims of an attorney general, right. Not something swore by oath from Google/Facebook. Claims from AGs strictly from conservative states.
by shp0ngle 5y ago
Those are claims of an attorney general, right. Not something swore by oath from Google/Facebook.
Claims from AGs strictly from conservative states.
- JeremyNT 5y agoYour insinuation that this is politically motivated seems plausible, but even so that doesn't mean the assertions are wrong. Sometimes when you go on a fishing expedition you actually reel in a big one.
- shp0ngle 5y agoIt obviously is motivated politically. Let’s wait and see if it’s actually true.
- flenserboy 5y agoYour accusation can be turned around: Interesting, isn't it, that those most likely to engage in collusion with G/FB are silent on the matter?
- JasonFruit 5y agoDon't try to use political division to redirect people's anger at each other. I'm to the point where I'm deeply suspicious of the motives of anyone who deploys a novel way to recast an issue as partisan. I hope others are equally suspicious.
- lazide 5y agoDoesn’t seem particularly novel - rather pointing out that it seems rather explicitly partisan already?
- shp0ngle 5y agoNo, I just want to make sure what am I looking at.
- crawfordcomeaux 5y agoYou live in an uncertain universe. This "sure" thing you want is already you grasping for a lie. You don't need to believe anything. You can learn to reason about things with uncertainty. There's even logics to help with it.