They are stuck in a tricky situation. To admit they have responsibility means they should have set up code of conduct with manageable moderation from the outse

They are stuck in a tricky situation. To admit they have responsibility means they should have set up code of conduct with manageable moderation from the outset (or at least not have open public pages). Alternatively, would you trust Facebook to be the arbiter of what is harmful to the public? Do you think they would hold to data and evidence, or political consensus and their own self-interest? I think Facebook has well and truly jumped the shark on morality or decency, they've had many opportunities to respond earlier.