3 ms·
> "Maybe Linux on the desktop doesn't suit your individual needs, but you seem awfully combative about it on the basis of your specific niche." I see your poin
by gavinray 5y ago
> "Maybe Linux on the desktop doesn't suit your individual needs, but you seem awfully combative about it on the basis of your specific niche."
I see your point. Devils advocate: we're each the center of our own universe, so whatever it is we find important is the marker for usability for us.
Ideally an OS should have tools for everything. Though I'm not certain if "Graphics Programming" means like GUI in C++ (pjmlp often talks about C++ Builder and C++/CX, so I believe he means that kind) or programming GPU's via CUDA. I don't think it's the second one -- Linux is much easier for GPU stuff (IE most ML projects/tutorials are only set up for Ubuntu) than Win.
I imagine the argument stems from a lack of Visual Studio equivalent on Linux. It looks like the only version that runs properly on Linux is VS 2005 -- LOL!
https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?iId=892&sClass=application https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?iId=892&sClass=ap...
If you work with some of the Visual Studio specific tooling around things like XAML or C++/CLI etc, yeah there's absolutely no substitute.
It's like Sketch on Mac (god I hate that company for being Mac-only) or Xcode. You're SOL, better buy a Mac.
Lettuce pray for the day WINE is good enough to run Visual Studio.
- pjmlp 5y agoYep, pretty much it.
- broodbucket 5y agoVS on Linux would indeed be great. I had to make a Win10 VM the other day to compile a C# WinForms project that I could run fine in Wine but couldn't modify. Similar deal with reverse engineering, Cheat Engine runs surprisingly well in Wine but none of the Mono stuff works. I do think it's a little reductive to discuss Linux struggling with things like Visual Studio that are only relevant because Windows is relevant, but that is our unfortunate reality.