3 ms·

And the goal of a good vaccination rollout is for 0% of admissions to be non-vaccinated. It seems like NL is doing well.

• pjc50 5y ago
  The more successful the rollout, the more the ratio goes up - this is counterintuitive, but happens because the number of unvaccinated people around that could possibly catch it in the first place becomes comparatively tiny.
  • aqme28 5y ago
    I think we might be getting our negatives confused. A perfectly successful rollout sees 100% of people vaccinated, so 100% of admissions are vaccinated, so 0% of admissions are non-vaccinated.
    • xwdv 5y ago
      So basically you're saying that wherever hospital admissions are 95% unvaccinated people the vaccine rollout hasn't worked.
      • AnonymousPlanet 5y ago
        From "A => B" does not follow "(not A) => (not B)" edit: swapped A and B by mistake, see comment below
        • TrianguloY 5y ago
          Hmm, logically speaking, yes, yes it does: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transposition_(logic) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transposition_(logic)
          • AnonymousPlanet 5y ago
            Haha, you're right! I mistyped. The left side should have been "(not A) => (not B)"
      • jleyank 5y ago
        No, it’s working but vaccination has not been completed. And, depending on the location, it doesn’t look like it’s going to complete.
        • xwdv 5y ago
          Ok, so what you’re saying is vaccine rollout is working if it’s 0% or 100%. So what’s the failure mode? 50% I guess?
          • aqme28 5y ago
            Can’t something just be in process before claiming it’s a success or failure?