> the name of the article itself was inflammatory enough to the powers that be There's a discussion of why it was deleted here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

> the name of the article itself was inflammatory enough to the powers that be There's a discussion of why it was deleted here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_authoritarian_regimes_supported_by_the_United_States_(2nd_nomination) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletio... Primarily because 'this "list" is inherently subjective and constitutes [synthesised conclusions]'; you'll also note on that page that "List of authoritarian regimes supported by the Soviet Union or Russia" was deleted at the same time - was that also at the behest of the US "powers that be"?