3 ms·
The specific claim is that because the law does not prohibit something, it is therefore ok. As Chesterton argues to the contrary "To have a right to do a thing
by bloaf 5y ago
The specific claim is that because the law does not prohibit something, it is therefore ok.
As Chesterton argues to the contrary "To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it."