3 ms·

> I absolutely disagree with the assertion that you somehow have the right to kill me or others. Prove that they are the ones "killing" others. That's the prob

> I absolutely disagree with the assertion that you somehow have the right to kill me or others. Prove that they are the ones "killing" others. That's the problem: there are claims with no proof. People who don't want to be infected by others can social distance, right? You can only be infected if you are close enough to someone who is infected. Stay away from those people. Actually, the funny thing is that vaccinated people can still get infected, but they are more likely to be asymptomatic. So they are more likely to be out and about infecting people without knowing it. And that's why I want proof that those who are unvaccinated are spreading the virus. For all we know, it could be the vaccinated.

nautilius 5y ago
> “ Prove that they are the ones "killing" others. That's the problem: there are claims with no proof” You may want to read up on what a disease is, and how it spreads. We know this since Pasteur and Semmelweis.
- gavinhoward 5y ago
  If people didn't want to die, they could just stay locked down, right? They are choosing to expose themselves by going out in public, so we could say that they are killing themselves. If you insist they must have the right to go out in public, why are you demanding that those who are unvaccinated not have that right, especially when the vaccinated can still spread the virus? And that brings up another point: you never did answer for the fact that it could be the vaccinated spreading the virus. What if they are the ones "killing" people? What then? That's why I want proof. To me, it seems that all you're doing is trying to spin a narrative. It's not really working. At least for me. Honestly, all of your arguments feel disingenuous. Some feel downright negative and presented in bad faith.