3 ms·
But the cameras’ supporters said they felt mystified by all the resistance. Going soft on crime could put their families at risk, they argued — and no one on pu
by notwhereyouare 5y ago
But the cameras’ supporters said they felt mystified by all the resistance. Going soft on crime could put their families at risk, they argued — and no one on public roads should expect privacy, anyway. If their opponents weren’t criminals, what did they have to hide? Who wouldn’t want to feel safer?
Ah yes, rational thoughts. If you have nothing to hide, then why won’t you let them search
- FjolsvithAase 5y agoIf the government can't spy on you, get the corporations to do it.
- dzhiurgis 5y agoAll of them do, but for some reason it became normal not to use it to solve petty crimes.
- FjolsvithAase 5y agoSchrodinger's cat. The object of observation becomes irritated by the act of observation.