It is easier to determine the increased sensitivity as one could refer to the topics that come up in the media e.g. free speech, standardised testing, shifting

It is easier to determine the increased sensitivity as one could refer to the topics that come up in the media e.g. free speech, standardised testing, shifting language around womanhood e.g. birthing people. The issue of "dangerous" is much more subjective. That one is going to take a little while longer to play out. After all, what is wrong with increased sensitivity to "harm"? Then the next step becomes "what do we do to correct or mitigate the harm?" The effects of eliminating all hierarchy in education might be good? Hiring based on demographics rather than qualifications might be good? Who knows? Perhaps when policy becomes linked to the new notions of "harm" is the point when it becomes dangerous?