4 ms·
I don't think psychology is the sole or even main issue at hand though I think that it is an ingredient in the rise to prominence of the "harms" concepts. I am
by crateless 5y ago
I don't think psychology is the sole or even main issue at hand though I think that it is an ingredient in the rise to prominence of the "harms" concepts. I am more inclined to the lack of religion and the role of human evolutionary biology, in addition to the distortion in the social sciences, as providing the best explanations I have heard so far for the current social phenomena.
- csee 5y agoLack of an out group, social media, and declining testosterone among men are other candidate explanations that I find plausible
- crateless 5y agoYes, social media is the pot in which all the ingredients are brewed.
- wayoutthere 5y agoDeclining testosterone among men is simply because men (and women, for that matter) are doing less exercise period. Physical exertion causes the body to release more testosterone to help muscle fibers recover. Many physical jobs today are done by machines or robots than ever. Even then, it’s not clear that testosterone levels are correlated with any specific behaviors or that the correlation goes the way we intuitively think it does. The anger and aggression can actually cause people to be more sensitive and react disproportionately to any perceived harm. See also roid rage, the prevalence of steroid use among police officers, and their propensity to provoke confrontation.
- csee 5y ago"because men (and women, for that matter) are doing less exercise period." Is that widely accepted? I really haven't dug into it. I heard something about endocrine disrupting chemicals playing a role, but that could be completely false. "Even then, it’s not clear that testosterone levels are correlated with any specific behaviors or that the correlation goes the way we intuitively think it does. The anger and aggression can actually cause people to be more sensitive and react disproportionately to any perceived harm." Yep, that's why I only consider it a candidate explanation. I heard Robert Sapolsky talk about it and it seems pretty complicated in the way it influences behavior.