>> think the law is the edge of what is acceptable. > particularly amoral group, > but politicians certainly are. To be fair, if all politicians were always m

>> think the law is the edge of what is acceptable. > particularly amoral group, > but politicians certainly are. To be fair, if all politicians were always morally rooted in the center of the law, nothing would ever change. No marijuana, no gay marriage. Or more appropriate: There’s a certain overlap of laws (and constitutional rights) that blur the edge of law (here: pursuit of happiness for the judge’s vs. corruption of justice).