5 ms·
> I don't see anything cringe worthy about that - it's not unusual for women to, uh, prefer bigger organs. Sorry to break it to you, it is unusual
by cupcake-unicorn 5y ago
> I don't see anything cringe worthy about that - it's not unusual for women to, uh, prefer bigger organs.
Sorry to break it to you, it is unusual
- lelanthran 5y ago>> > I don't see anything cringe worthy about that - it's not unusual for women to, uh, prefer bigger organs. > Sorry to break it to you, it is unusual In a work of dystopian fiction it's very far away from "cringe worthy", as IRL there are already some women who have that preference. Calling it cringe worthy is somewhat puritanical ...
- cupcake-unicorn 5y agoHate to break it to you bud if you heard that from a woman they were probably just trying to stoke your ego, no one has a "preference" for getting a bruised cervix
- lelanthran 5y ago> Hate to break it to you bud if you heard that from a woman they were probably just trying to stoke your ego, no one has a "preference" for getting a bruised cervix People have preferences for all sorts of pain and discomfort during sex. It's simply puritanical to suggest that a certain subset of the population must not have a certain sexual preference. And, in view of the story we are discussing, the woman in question was given that preference due to physiological manipulations made by AM; there is nothing I see cringe-worthy about the situation, unless you are off the opinion that women must not like a particular type of sexual interaction, because it makes you uncomfortable.