4 ms·
I mean it was a government regulation, there isn't much they could do about it. I assume the 2 stack limit was due to safety reasons, like maybe they are more p
by Clubber 5y ago
I mean it was a government regulation, there isn't much they could do about it. I assume the 2 stack limit was due to safety reasons, like maybe they are more prone to collapsing like dominoes when stacked too high, and a good wind blows, I don't know. It makes me think of the egg crate challenge a little bit.
It's good that the mayor made a temporary adjustment and was allowed to save face. Hopefully it will make a difference.
- seoaeu 5y agoAllegedly, the 2 stack limit was put in place for aesthetic reasons. On the ships they're stacked way taller than that!
- zbrozek 5y agoChecks out, this is CA after all. NIMBYs are all about their sight lines. Couldn't possibly let a stack of containers diminish their view.
- mensetmanusman 5y agoNot In My Expansive Front Yard View Of The Ocean Untouched By Globalization NIMEFYVOTOUBG
- wikibob 5y agoNo. It was entirely for esthetics.
- mulmen 5y agoI live near a port. Containers are regularly stacked five high.