> If enough people find that the results are not reliable in any way then they are able to verify it themselves The whole point is that they can't. They need t

> If enough people find that the results are not reliable in any way then they are able to verify it themselves The whole point is that they can't. They need to rely on other people to verify the results. They cannot "verify it themselves". > hypothetical scenario relies on The hypothetical scenario relies on wanting the benefits of digital voting (of which there are many) without the major downside (of which there is one). A publicly verifiable ledger gives you the benefits of digital without the major downside, which is that generally with anything digital you can commit fraud at scale.