4 ms·

It had been officially released to users for a short period of time before it was taken down, as the article states. Since it was public, that public use of the

It had been officially released to users for a short period of time before it was taken down, as the article states. Since it was public, that public use of the code needs to be published as it was when it was public.

Andrew_nenakhov 5y ago
No. AGPL requires to provide source code only to users of the server [1]: It requires the operator of a network server to provide the source code of the modified version running there to the users of that server. Also, AGPL does not define a method for providing source code, be it publishing on a web server, sending by email, delivering on a floppy disk via messenger dogs or printing it on a papyrus and sending it with pigeon mail. And lastly, you claim the service was 'officially released'. According to Trump's official statement, the official launch of a service will be in January. [1]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]