3 ms·

The software. Not the content.

• randombits0 5y ago
  So what was modified? Anything the author could see would be “content”.
  • hairofadog 5y ago
    My guess would be CSS, JavaScript, and that sort of thing. It's possible they did some actual engineering work; if it was me, I would be concerned about people trying to bring the site down. I would guess they're also trying to make it a fundraising vehicle, so maybe some changes related to that? I'm not familiar with the Mastodon codebase so it's difficult to speculate but these would be my guesses.
  • woodruffw 5y ago
    > So what was modified? Anything the author could see would be “content”. Modifications to views, models, stylesheets, &c. would all fall under the AGPL's definition of source code and would be considered sufficient for triggering the distribution clause.